


Comparison
& Review
Bonds
Comparison
& Review
As we have seen, Economic analysis of Engineering projects can be done by various
methods. They are
:
- Payback Period Method
- Worth based Methods (PW, FW, AW)
- ROR Method
- BC Ratio Method
Of these, which is the
correct one to use?- Depends on the situation based on :
-
Type of industry.
- Type of investment.
- Length of study period.
- Financial stability of company.
- Audience for presentation.
- Method may be set by policy.
- All have advantages.
- May give conflicting
results between methods.
Payback Period
- Best for uniform cash flow patterns.
- Best for same life options .
- Good for short life options (i % is not a big factor).
- Quick and Easy .
- Simple to understand.
- Avoids time value of money.
- Results
may be "incorrect".
Worth Based Methods
- ( PW, FW, AW )
- All methods give consistent results. Hence it allows the best method
to fit the situation.
- Requires known i %.
- Allows for ease of multiple
N option analysis.
- Results sometimes are less meaningful to understand.
However these methods are good for : - Direct investment
options
- Annual expenditures
- Required sums
Rate of Return
(ROR)
- Most meaningful results (Finds i %).
- It is the easiest to understand vs
real world i %.
- Possibly difficult to calculate.
- May give multiple answers.
- Requires Incremental Analysis
between options.
- Allows equal opportunity to invest all possible cash to beat MARR vs. finding the
best worth option.(Such as in a case where high cost leads to a lower worth)
BC Ratio
- Requires Incremental Analysis between options.
- Fairly simple to calculate.
- Easy for public to understand. (BC Ratio >1.0 is good).Hence good for
public work projects.
- Good to use when benefits are
obscure.
ie: Less O&M =
Benefit
Less Damage =
Benefit
Less impact =
Benefit
Time Savings =
Benefit
Close Results
in Analysis
If the analysis gives very close final results, then consider the following
:
- Option with lower first cost.
- Shorter life option.
- Chance to re-evaluate.
- Less impact due to technology.
- Less impact
of inflation.
- Possible lack of need of project in future.
These concerns, while not officially a part of any
engineering economic analysis should be considered in tight decisions.
Bonds
- Bonds are financial instruments, setting forth
conditions under which money is borrowed.
- They are sold by government agencies and corporations to raise
$ for projects.
- Bond Terms :
- Face Value (V)- The amount for which
the bond is redeemed at maturity. Sometimes it is the purchase price from
the issuer.
- Bond Rate (b)- The bonds interest rate which determines
the regular premiums.
- Interest per Period (I)- I = Vb/c where c = # of Payments/year
- Bonds can be bought and sold before maturity.
- If the going interest rate
< the bond rate, then the bond can be sold for more than the face value.
Interest on government bonds is tax free.
- The Bond rate is greater for lesser solvent issuers, who
have a greater risk of not paying back the face value (Junk Bonds).
Example :The current interest rate is 7%. Is
it a good investment to buy a 6%, $1000
bond for
$900 with semi-annual payments with maturity in 7 years?

I =
Vb/c = 1000(0.06) / 2 = $30
$900 = $30(P/A, i, 14) + $1000(P/F, i, 14)
For i = 4% ---> PW = $894
i = 3% ---> PW = $1000
Thus interpolate
to find the semi-annual i*.
i* = 3% + 1%(1000-900) = 3% + 0.94% = 3.94% per Semi-annual
period.
(1000-894)
Nominal rate n = (3.94%)(2) = 7.88%
Effective Annual Rate = i EFF = (1 +
r/m)m-1
=
(1 +0.0788 /
2)2-1
=
8.04% > 7%
Hence the purchase appears to be a good
investment.
- Don't confuse the bond rate (b) with the going, current
interest rate(i).
- Don't forget to find or use an i for the correct compounding period (Usually
assumed to be the same as the # of bond interest payments/year, but not always.)
- Use I = Vb/c first to help determine the cash flow. Use a cash flow diagram to help
visualize the cash flow of the bond.
- Use PW, EAW, FW or ROR to analyze the bond's
cash flow.
|
Added to the Web: May
20, 2002.
Last updated: April 26, 2002.
Web page design by Dan
Solarek. |

http://cset.sp.utoledo.edu/engt3600/
|